. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 25.

Published in final edited form as: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Aug 24;44(8):817–835. doi: 10.1111/apt.13780

Table 3.

Comparison of the microbial communities between the uninflamed ileal pouch and pouchitis

FAP ileal pouches compared to UC ileal pouches
Taxa with increased abundance in UC ileal pouches compared to FAP ileal pouches	Taxa with increased abundance in FAP ileal pouches compared to UC ileal pouches
Alcaligenaceae⁸¹	Bacteroidaceae^{81, 86, 95}
Akkermansia spp. ⁹⁵	Bacteroides vulgatus⁸¹
Clostridium spp. ⁹⁵	Lactobacillus spp.⁹⁵
Comamonadaceae⁸¹	Prevotellaceae⁸¹
Eubacterium spp.⁹⁵	Ruminococcaceae⁸¹
Lachnospiraceae⁹⁵	Faecalibacterium spp.⁹⁵
Moraxellaceae⁸¹	Faecalibacterium prausnitzii⁸¹
Prevotella spp. ⁹⁵	Streptococcus spp.⁹⁵
Roseburia spp.⁹⁵
Sulfate-reducing bacteria^{73, 77}
Veillonella spp. ⁹⁵

Changes in the bacterial composition during pouchitis

Taxa with increased abundance during pouchitis	Taxa with reduced abundance during pouchitis

Clostridium perfringens^{22, 90}	Alcaligenaceae⁸¹
Enterobacteriaceae^{81, 82}	Bacteroides spp.^{82, 86}
Escherichia coli^{22, 81}	Bifidobacterium spp.⁹⁰
Fusobacterium spp.⁹⁶	Enterococcaceae⁹⁷
Ruminococcus obeum⁹⁶	Faecalibacterium spp.^{82, 96}
Sulfate-reducing bacteria⁷⁹	Lachnospiraceae⁸²
Total number of aerobic bacteria^{22, 90}	Blautia spp.⁸⁶
	Lactobacillus spp.⁹⁰
	Parabacteroides spp.⁸⁶
	Ruminococcaceae⁸²
	Ruminococcus gnavus⁹⁶
	Streptococcus spp.^{81, 96}
	Total number of anaerobic bacteria²²