Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 4;53(1):15–34. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12696

Table 2.

Marginal Effects of Probit and IV‐Probit Estimates

(a) Probit Estimation
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
ln case volume −0.0086*** −0.0104*** −0.0115*** −0.0142*** −0.0123***
(0.0015) (0.0015) (0.0020) (0.0021) (0.0022)
Patient characteristics No Yes No Yes Yes
Hospital charcteristics No No Yes Yes Yes
Socioeconomic indicators No No No No Yes
Settlement structure indicators No No No No Yes
Observations 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541
Number of hospitals 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262
(b) IV‐Probit; Instrument: Number of Potential Patients and Further Hospitals in the Regional Area
(6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Ln case volume −0.0191*** −0.0247*** −0.0289*** −0.0355*** −0.0334***
(0.0037) (0.0039) (0.0055) (0.0058) (0.0061)
Patient characteristics No Yes No Yes Yes
Hospital charcteristics No No Yes Yes Yes
Socioeconomic indicators No No No No Yes
Settlement structure indicators No No No No Yes
First‐stage F‐statistic 78.1848 80.0255 47.8049 48.2419 42.3054
Test for endogeneity (p‐value) 0.0005 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 0.0001
Overidentification test (p‐value) 0.0043 0.0006 0.0936 0.039 0.0999
Observations 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541
Number of hospitals 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262
(c) IV‐Probit; Instrument: Number of Potential Patients per Hospital in the Regional Area
(11) (12) (13) (14) (15)
Ln case volume −0.0138*** −0.0176*** −0.0217*** −0.0280*** −0.0259***
(0.0037) (0.0041) (0.0060) (0.0066) (0.0071)
Patient characteristics No Yes No Yes Yes
Hospital charcteristics No No Yes Yes Yes
Socioeconomic indicators No No No No Yes
Settlement structure indicators No No No No Yes
First‐stage F‐statistic 186.7512 189.1469 130.9806 130.7457 119.6255
Test for endogeneity (p‐value) 0.0930 0.0372 0.0557 0.0175 0.0299
Observations 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541 89,541
Number of hospitals 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262 1,262

Clustered standard errors (at the hospital level) in parentheses. *p < .10, **p < .05, ***p < .01.