Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;16(1):221–233. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12762

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression and phylogenetic analysis of MaRAP2‐4. (a) Through SSH of waterlogging‐tolerant Mentha arvensis and susceptible M. piperita, an EST encoding ERF TF was obtained. Through 5′ and 3′ RACE, it was made full length and named as MaRAP2‐4. (b) Higher soluble sugars content (mg/g FW) of M. arvensis in comparison to M. piperita under control conditions. (c) Induced relative expression of MaRAP2‐4 after 1, 3 and 5 h of drought, salt, cold, ABA and MeJA treatment. (d) Induced relative expression of MaRAP2‐4 after 2, 4, 6 and 8 days of waterlogging and ethylene treatment. (e) MEGA6.06 phylogenetic tree of MaRAP2‐4 with hypoxia/waterlogging‐responsive and other ERFs. Represented values were calculated from mean of three independent experiment performed. The error bars show mean ± SD. The letters above column indicates a statistically significant difference for the data of M. arvensis treated (different stress and hormone treatments) samples at different time intervals. Different letters indicate a significant difference between columns (P < 0.05) while same letters indicate no significant difference.