Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;8:1571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19356-4

Table 1.

Comparison of five centrality algorithms using different performance criteria (i.e. functional, computational efficiency, and accuracy). The bold values represent the best performer for specific performance criteria.

Algorithm Functional Performance Computational Efficiency Performance Accuracy Performance
Architecture Time complexity
GOT with SC2 Nodes and Links Fully Distributed O(log2|V|) < O(GOT) < O(log3|V|) 83.4%
CFBC31 Nodes or Links Centralized O(I(|V| − 1) + |V||E|log|V|) 8.3%
BC30 Nodes or Links Centralized O(|V||E|) 8.3%
SOC32 Nodes Partially Distributed O(|V|2) < O(SOC) < O(|V|3) 0%
DACCER21 Nodes Fully Distributed n/a 0%