Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 26;8:1697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19752-w

Table 5.

A comparison of our AMP prediction method with state-of-the-art methods on AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, MCC, and κ by means of datasets Ctrain and Ctest.

Method ML algorithm Number of features AUC-ROC AUC-PR MCC κ
iAMPpred# SVM 66 0.98 0.99 0.91
iAMP-2L# FKNN 46 0.95 0.9
AmPEP (DF) RF 105 0.995 0.957 0.920 0.962
AmPEP (DF_PCC < 0.7) RF 80 0.994 0.950 0.914 0.913
AmPEP (DF_PCC < 0.6) RF 43 0.994 0.934 0.919 0.918
AmPEP (DF_PCC < 0.5) RF 23 0.995 0.905 0.924 0.923

#Results were taken from refs5,6.