Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 26;8:1690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20089-7

Table 3.

Content Analysis Table for SOs.

Category Number of individuals who mentioned the category ‘Positive’ mentionsa ‘Negative’ mentionsa Number of mentions overall
Group and Social Contexts 22 (84.62%) 21 1 96
Importance of Context 18 (69.23%) 18 0 40
Reliance on Extrafacial Information 12 (46.15%) 12 0 38

aPositive and negative mentions offer more insight into the categories. For example, SOs who said that DP does impact their behaviour is social contexts and in groups are considered a positive mention whereas those who said that their significant other’s DP does not impact their behaviour is social contexts and in groups are considered a negative mention This is elaborated within the Discussion. The categories revealed by the SO data and the number of individuals who discussed that category.