Table 3.
Category | Number of individuals who mentioned the category | ‘Positive’ mentionsa | ‘Negative’ mentionsa | Number of mentions overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group and Social Contexts | 22 (84.62%) | 21 | 1 | 96 |
Importance of Context | 18 (69.23%) | 18 | 0 | 40 |
Reliance on Extrafacial Information | 12 (46.15%) | 12 | 0 | 38 |
aPositive and negative mentions offer more insight into the categories. For example, SOs who said that DP does impact their behaviour is social contexts and in groups are considered a positive mention whereas those who said that their significant other’s DP does not impact their behaviour is social contexts and in groups are considered a negative mention This is elaborated within the Discussion. The categories revealed by the SO data and the number of individuals who discussed that category.