Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 26;9:402. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02808-2

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Tuning the void space of SnO2@GCs at the nanoscale. af SEM images showing the more expanded structure of SnO2@GCs containing increasing amounts of sulfur (0, 5, 11, 15, 21, 49%) after it has all been removed. g Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms, and h pore size distributions of SnO2@GCs showing that the pore structure changes and pore size increases as the original sulfur content increases. i Calculated void space and j density changes as a result of removing the sulfur from the six samples. Error bars indicate s.d. (n = 3). Scale bars: af 500 nm