Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 24;8(1):e018763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018763

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of bone mineral density

Men Premenopausal women Postmenopausal women
Beta SE P value Beta SE P value Beta SE P value
Lumbar spine
 Model 1 −0.2899 0.2570 0.2604 −0.1820 0.1338 0.1753 −0.0778 0.1560 0.6186
 Model 2 −0.0194 0.2472 0.9375 −0.1244 0.1320 0.3471 0.1261 0.1449 0.3847
 Model 3 0.0777 0.2517 0.7578 −0.1400 0.1365 0.3063 0.1055 0.1482 0.4772
Total femur
 Model 1 −1.1271 0.3862 0.0038 0.0260 0.1426 0.8553 −0.2160 0.1653 0.1924
 Model 2 −1.0141 0.3913 0.0101 0.0034 0.1454 0.8118 −0.0549 0.1586 0.7296
 Model 3 −0.8842 0.3892 0.0240 0.0266 0.1511 0.8609 −0.0038 0.1690 0.8201
Femoral neck
 Model 1 −0.8639 0.4739 0.0695 0.1211 0.1328 0.3625 −0.0713 0.1646 0.6650
 Model 2 −0.6742 0.4917 0.1716 0.1004 0.1335 0.4528 0.0031 0.1565 0.8409
 Model 3 −0.5278 0.4737 0.2663 0.0847 0.1392 0.5433 −0.0006 0.1648 0.9969

Model 1 is adjusted for age and body mass index.

Model 2 is adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, ethanol intake, regular exercise, educational level and income.

Model 3 is adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, ethanol intake, regular exercise, educational level, income, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, stress level and tinnitus.

Results are presented as an estimated beta with corresponding SE and P value.