Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Sep 21;27(1):10.1111/ecc.12772. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12772

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Total(n=115) Intervention Group
Difference
TTMI (n=57) SLM (n=58)
Age (SD) 56.74(10.80) 55.73 (10.91) 57.74 (10.70) t(113)=1.0
Race/Ethnicity n (%) χ2(4)=3.03
 White 110 (95.7) 54 (94.7) 56 (96.6)
 African American 2 (1.7) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.7)
 Hispanics 2 (1.7) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.7)
 Other 1 (.9) 1 (1.8) 0
Marital status n (%) χ2 (1)=.09
 Single/Divorced/separated/widowed 32 (28.1) 15 (26.8) 17 (29.3)
 Married/other long-term partnered relationship 82 (71.9) 41 (73.2) 41 (70.7)
Education n (%) χ2(1)=.42
 Less than college degree 45 (39.1) 24 (42.1) 21 (36.2)
 At least college degree (BA/BS) 70 (60.9) 33 (57.9) 37 (63.8)
Household income n (%) χ2(1)=.34
 < $50,000 22 (20.0) 9 (16.4) 13 (23.6)
 ≥ $50,000 88 (80.0) 46 (83.6) 42 (76.4)
Prior diagnosis χ2(1)=6.89**
 No 89 (77.4) 50 (87.7) 39 (67.2)
 Yes 26 (22.6) 7 (12.3) 19 (32.8)

Note. TTMI=Targeting the Teachable Moment Intervention; SLM=Standard Lifestyle Management. **p < .01.