Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):e02057-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02057-17

TABLE 3.

Statistical comparison of PK parameters for ESRD subjects dosed after hemodialysis versus healthy subjectsa

PK parameter Cohortb Geometric mean Ratio of geometric mean 90% confidence interval for ratio of geometric mean
AUC0–last (μg · h/ml) ESRD 9.21 1.03 0.86–1.24
Healthy 8.91
AUC0–inf (μg · h/ml) ESRD 10.10 1.05 0.87–1.26
Healthy 9.61
Cmax (μg/ml) ESRD 1.78 0.94 0.72–1.23
Healthy 1.88
CL (liters/h) ESRD 9.91 0.95 0.79–1.14
Healthy 10.4
a

The ANOVA model included log-transformed PK parameters as the response variables and matched pairs as the random effect, and the fixed effect term was ESRD status. AUC0–last, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration in plasma; AUC0–inf, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity in plasma; Cmax, maximum observed concentration of omadacycline in plasma; CL, total body clearance; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; PK, pharmacokinetics.

b

ESRD subjects dosed after hemodialysis served as the test cohort for this analysis and healthy subjects served as the reference cohort for this analysis.