Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):e02190-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02190-17

TABLE 2.

Rates of antimicrobial resistance among isolates collected in this study and comparison with JANIS data

Antimicrobial agent(s) % of isolates collected in this study resistant among:
% of Acinetobacter species isolates resistant (no. of isolates tested) in JANIS annual report 2013b
IC II (n = 245a) Non-IC II (n = 400) Non-baumannii (n = 221) All isolates (n = 866)
Piperacillin-tazobactam 24.5 0.8 0.9 7.5 7.8 (4,953)
Ampicillin-sulbactam 8.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 5.8 (4,498)
Ceftazidime 69.8 2.0 0.9 20.9 10.0 (20,856)
Cefepime 48.2 4.0 0.0 15.5 9.2 (15,394)
Imipenem 3.7 1.3 0.0 1.6 3.6 (16,947)
Meropenem 4.9 1.3 0.0 2.0 3.7 (17,027)
Gentamicin 51.0 6.0 2.7 17.9 9.5 (19,422)
Amikacin 24.5 0.0 0.0 6.9 3.5 (20,863)
Levofloxacin 87.8 13.0 2.7 31.5 8.3 (20,040)
Ciprofloxacin 100 24.8 6.8 41.5 No data
Minocycline 13.5 0.0 0.0 3.8 No data
Colistin 0.0 0.3 1.8 0.6 No data
Polymyxin B 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 No data
a

n = number of isolates.

b

Rates of resistance in 2013 JANIS data (15) were recalculated based on the breakpoints of CLSI M100-S25 (36).