Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 May 14;137(1):32–40. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0033-OA

Table 2.

Study Participant, Methodology, and Diagnosis Demographics and Statistics

Characteristics of the Study Participants
Characteristics of the Pathologists Demographics, No. (%)
Total number of participants/total approached 24/26 (92)
Sex, M     18 (75)
Surgical pathology fellowship, yes     16 (67)
Expert lung pathologist, yes     12 (50)
Years of experience:
 Minimum 1
 Median 17  
 Maximum 36  

Quality Assessment of Study Methodology
Characteristics of the H&E Slides Frequency, %

Slide of sufficient quality, yes 91
Confidence in assigned diagnosis:
 High 52
 Moderate 40
 Low   8
Request for special stains, yes 10

Distribution of Morphologic Diagnoses
Morphology Original Diagnosis, % Study Diagnosis, %

Squamous cell 35% 36%
Adenocarcinoma 35% 31%
Adenosquamous   13     3
Large cell     9   17
Miscellaneousa     6     7
Sarcomatoid carcinoma     1     4
Carcinoid     1     2

Original Pathologic Grade Assigned to Study H&E Slides
Original Pathologic Grade Results, %

Not poorly differentiated: 57
 Well differentiated   3
 Moderately differentiated 54
Poorly differentiated 43

Abbreviation: H&E, hematoxylin-eosin.

a

Category includes adenoid cystic, mucoepidermoid, spindle cell, basaloid non–small cell lung carcinoma, and malignant mesothelioma.