Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 23;24(1):7–23. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0484-1

Table 1.

Effect of different magnitude of PEG-induced imbibitional dehydration stress (− 0.344, − 0.851 and − 1.619 MPa) on germination and early growth performances [assessed in terms of T50, Vigour Index (VI), Relative Germination Performance (RGP), Relative Growth Index (RGI) and Relative Water Content (RWC)] of four indigenous aromatic rice varieties of Oryza sativa L. (Cultivars Tulaipanji, Sitabhog, Badshabhog and Jamainadu)

Early growth performances Landraces of aromatic rice Imbibitional dehydration stress [IDS] (MPa)
Untreated control − 0.344 − 0.851 − 1.619
T50 (h) Jamainadu 26.09 ± 0.05 22.22 ± 0.14** 31.58 ± 0.19 150 ± 0.54
Tulaipanji 26.09 ± 0.08 19.35 ± 0.05** 24 ± 0.03** 25 ± 0.04**
Sitabhog 37.5 ± 0.23 40 ± 0.25 60 ± 0.19 300 ± 1.4
Badshabhog 75 ± 0.23 120 ± 0.41 100 ± 0.82 100 ± 0.27
Vigor index (VI) Jamainadu 0.148 ± 0.001 0.083 ± .0003** 0.106 ± 0.007 0.067 ± 0.001**
Tulaipanji 0.082 ± 0.001 0.052 ± 0.0003** 0.060 ± 0.001** 0.079 ± 0.0003**
Sitabhog 0.084 ± 0.001 0.074 ± 0.001** 0.063 ± 0.001** 0.099 ± 0.001
Badshabhog 0.122 ± 0.016 0.069 ± 0.003 0.060 ± 0.002 0.138 ± 0.005
Relative germination performance (RGP) Jamainadu 100.00 ± 0 104.44 ± 0.27 86.66 ± 0.19** 51.11 ± 0.25**
Tulaipanji 100.00 ± 0 100.00 ± 0 100.00 ± 0 100.00 ± 0
Sitabhog 100.00 ± 0 88.88 ± 0.26** 77.77 ± 0.19** 80.55 ± 0.15**
Badshabhog 100.00 ± 0 120.00 ± 0.68 100.00 ± 0.27 92.00 ± 0.22**
Relative growth index (RGI) Jamainadu 100.00 ± 0 99.03 ± 0.23 101.44 ± 0.54 95.65 ± 0.24*
Tulaipanji 100.00 ± 0 106.03 ± 0.82 108.62 ± 0.54 104.31 ± 0.27
Sitabhog 100.00 ± 0 102.02 ± 0.41 91.91 ± 0.27** 102.02 ± 0.54
Badshabhog 100.00 ± 0 104.12 ± 0.68 101.03 ± 0.41 109.28 ± 0.98
Relative water content (RWC) Jamainadu 91.7 ± 0.22 89.20 ± 0.19** 88.78 ± 0.15** 83.50 ± 0.17**
Tulaipanji 90.23 ± 0.18 90.96 ± 0.16 89.27 ± 0.15** 86.25 ± 0.14**
Sitabhog 92.00 ± 0.21 89.20 ± 0.19** 83.62 ± 0.17** 81.20 ± 0.16**
Badshabhog 87.05 ± 0.20 84.32 ± 0.17** 82.62 ± 0.13** 82.44 ± 0.14**

Results are mean of three replicates ± standard error

* Significant from control at 0.05 level (t test); ** significant from control at 0.01 level (t test)