. 2017 Nov 30;24(1):115–123. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0490-3

Table 1.

Effect of mancozeb on the morphological parameters of Allium seedlings

Mancozeb conc. (ppm)	Germination (%)	Survival (%)	Root length (cm)	Shoot length (cm)	Root shoot length ratio	Phytotoxicity (%)	Tolerance index	Seedling vigor index
0	100.00 ± 0.00^f	100.00 ± 0.00^g	16.66 ± 0.67^g	18.00 ± 0.29^f	0.93 ± 0.05^d	0.00 ± 0.00^a	0.00 ± 0.00^a	3466.66 ± 44.15^g
10	91.67 ± 1.67^e	86.67 ± 1.66^f	10.11 ± 0.06^f	12.33 ± 1.20^e	0.84 ± 0.08^d	39.31 ± 0.38^b	0.60 ± 0.03^h	2053.23 ± 80.12^f
30	88.33 ± 1.66^e	83.33 ± 1.66^f	7.24 ± 0.14^e	12.66 ± 0.88^e	0.58 ± 0.05^c	56.54 ± 0.86^c	0.43 ± 0.08^g	1760.77 ± 99.44^e
50	78.33 ± 1.66^d	61.67 ± 1.67^e	6.58 ± 0.32^d,e	12.00 ± 0.57^e	0.54 ± 0.02^b,c	60.50 ± 1.92^d	0.39 ± 0.01^f	1455.90 ± 80.95^d
70	66.67 ± 1.67^c	55.00 ± 2.89^d	6.18 ± 0.09^c,d	11.20 ± 0.38^d,e	0.55 ± 0.02^b,c	62.88 ± 0.59^e	0.37 ± 0.05^e	1157.77 ± 16.87^c
90	51.67 ± 4.41^b	46.66 ± 1.68^c	6.14 ± 0.07^c,d	9.80 ± 0.26^c,d	0.63 ± 0.02^c	63.14 ± 0.42^e	0.37 ± 0.04^e	821.80 ± 59.42^b
110	48.33 ± 4.42^a,b	38.33 ± 3.34^b	5.52 ± 0.01^c	8.50 ± 0.40^b,c	0.65 ± 0.03^c	66.88 ± 0.10^f	0.33 ± 0.01^d	678.75 ± 69.61^b
130	43.33 ± 3.33^a	26.67 ± 1.67^a	3.32 ± 0.03^b	7.83 ± 0.44^a,b	0.43 ± 0.02^a,b	80.05 ± 0.02^g	0.20 ± 0.02^c	484.00 ± 44.60^a
150	41.66 ± 1.67^a	23.33 ± 3.34^a	2.03 ± 0.03^a	6.13 ± 0.13^a	0.83 ± 0.01^d	87.57 ± 0.21^h	0.12 ± 0.02^b	340.66 ± 18.72^a

Superscripts (a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h) represent groups which are significantly different at P < 0.05, as determined by ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test amongst the mean ± S.E. of 3 replicates at different treatment concentration when compared to control