Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;24(1):115–123. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0490-3

Table 2.

Effect of chlorpyrifos on the morphological parameters of Allium seedlings

Chlorpyrifos conc. (ppm) Germination (%) Survival (%) Root length (cm) Shoot length (cm) Root shoot length ratio Phytotoxicity (%) Tolerance index Seedling vigor index
0 100.00 ± 0.00f 100.00 ± 0.00f 12.90 ± 0.38e 20.67 ± 0.88g 0.62 ± 0.01c 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a 3357.00 ± 119.35f
5 71.66 ± 1.67e 48.33 ± 4.41e 4.90 ± 0.26d 17.33 ± 0.17f 0.28 ± 0.01b 62.01 ± 2.05b 0.37 ± 0.02d 1593.66 ± 44.38e
10 45.00 ± 2.89d 40.00 ± 5.05d,e 2.30 ± 0.15c 14.43 ± 0.23e 0.15 ± 0.00a 82.17 ± 1.18c 0.17 ± 0.01c 753.33 ± 54.63d
15 43.33 ± 3.38c,d 31.66 ± 3.34c,d 2.13 ± 0.33b,c 10.83 ± 0.12d 0.19 ± 0.02a 83.46 ± 2.58c 0.16 ± 0.02c 564.66 ± 62.83c
20 36.67 ± 1.66c 28.33 ± 3.33b,c 1.43 ± 0.18a,b 8.73 ± 0.12c 0.16 ± 0.01a 88.88 ± 1.44d 0.11 ± 0.04b 373.66 ± 15.46b
25 28.33 ± 1.67b 18.33 ± 3.33a,b 1.30 ± 0.10a 6.33 ± 0.03b 0.20 ± 0.10a 89.92 ± 0.77d 0.10 ± 0.07b 216.00 ± 10.54a,b
30 18.33 ± 4.41a 13.33 ± 3.33a 0.90 ± 0.05a 3.40 ± 0.10a 0.26 ± 0.01b 93.02 ± 0.44d 0.06 ± 0.04b 77.83 ± 17.11a

Superscripts (a, b, c, d, e and f) represent groups which are significantly different at P < 0.05, as determined by ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test amongst the mean ± S.E. of 3 replicates at different treatment concentration when compared to control