Table 3.
Explained genetic variance estimated by cross-validation of the Glu-1 loci in the basis population 2009–2013, and prediction accuracy for each dough rheological trait in the forward prediction of 2014–2016
Parameter | Explained genetic variance (%) | Model prediction accuracy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glu-A1 | Glu-B1 | Glu-D1 | RR-BLUP | W-BLUPa | INDEXb | MW-BLUPc | |
Water uptake | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.43 |
Development | 12.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.39 |
Stability | 30.4 | 4.0 | 33.9 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
Quality number | 18.0 | 1.8 | 29.5 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
Resistance | 2.4 | 0.6 | 7.3 | 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.49 |
Extensibility | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
Energy | 6.3 | 0.0 | 12.7 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.63 |
Average | 6.3 | 1.3 | 7.3 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.47 |
aGlu1 markers that explained more than 5.00% of the genetic variance were modelled as fixed effects
bMulti-trait model extending the training population with additional lines phenotyped for protein content
cMulti-trait W-BLUP model combining both prior prediction model extensions