Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 12;9(1):892–900. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23184

Table 6. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic value of serum bilirubin.

Factors Training cohort Validation cohort
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
P HR (95%CI) P P HR (95%CI) P
Age (years) 0.085 0.234
Sex (male) 0.124 0.162
Smoking 0.541 0.324
ECOG PS (2–3) 0.594 0.160
Histological type 0.220 0.108
TNM stage <0.001 <0.001
 I Reference Reference
 II 1.24 (0.96–3.25) 0.057 1.30 (1.11–2.64) 0.020
 III 2.59 (1.20–4.98) <0.001 2.42 (1.14–3.58) <0.001
pT stage <0.001 <0.001
 T1–2 Reference Reference
 T3–4 2.45 (1.22–5.19) <0.001 1.99 (1.12–3.20) 0.002
pN stage <0.001 <0.001
 T0–1 Reference Reference
 T2–3 1.86 (1.08–2.80) 0.005 2.00 (1.20–3.52) <0.001
chemotherapy 0.042 1.14 (0.95–1.86) 0.089 0.030 1.23 (0.82–1.64) 0.124
CEA (abnormal) 0.385 0.110
TBIL (≥15 μmol/L) 0.005 0.98 (0.76–1.24) 0.582 0.012 1.01 (0.65–1.09) 0.101
DBIL (≥4.5 μmol/L) <0.001 0.64 (0.52–0.91) 0.004 0.004 0.74 (0.61–0.88) <0.001
IBIL (≥9.1 μmol/L) 0.032 1.00 (0.80–1.35) 0.532 0.001 0.94 (0.56–1.02) 0.098

ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; TBIL, total bilirubin; DBIL, direct bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin.