Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 28;32(2):447–465. doi: 10.1177/0269216317711570

Table 2.

Characteristics of economic studies.

Reference Type of study/no. of participants Country Disease Intervention Outcomes Results Nurse training/title Nurse activities
Adlbrecht et al.16 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-effectiveness), (n = 190) Austria Heart failure UC, home-based nurse care (HNC), HNC depending on NT-proBNP level (BNC) C: death and re-hospitalization. E: cost/year survived Costs per year survived after discharge were €19,694 for UC, €14,262 for HNC and €8784 for BNC. Specialized heart failure nurse Home visits, consultations, telephone follow ups, order and review blood analysis/tests, education to patients and carers
Arts et al.54 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-utility), (n = 337) The Netherlands Diabetes UC (care provided by physician), I (care by nurse specialist) C: QOL, adverse events – hospital admissions, side effects from drugs,
E: costs/QALY
Intervention causes €3.61 reduction in direct costs per QALY gained, compared to UC. The ratio for overall costs shows a €20.34 increase per QALY gained (NS). Nurse specialist Patient care
Beaver et al.39 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-minimization), (n = 374) UK Cancer (breast) I (telephone follow up by CNS), UC (hospital-based consultations) C: psychological morbidity
E: resource use, difference in costs
Telephone follow up was more expensive than UC (mean difference: €55, 95% CI: €29–€77). Specialist nurse Apply a structure questionnaire by phone, order test (mammography)
Haji Ali Afzali et al.55 Observational (cost-effectiveness), (n = 339) Australia Diabetes I (high- vs low-level involvement of Practice Nurse consultation) C: change in blood pressure, cholesterol and HBA1c levels.
E: cost/HBA1c levels
No difference in total cost between the two models. High-level model was associated with better clinical outcomes. Practice nurse Education, self-management advice, monitoring clinical progress, assessing treatment
Iles et al.56 Observational (only cost analysis), (n = 254) Australia Chronic diseases I (Practice Nurse-led care), UC (GP-led care) E: costs, GP visits Net additional cost of PN-led care over GP-led care was US$129 per patient per year. Practice nurse Patient care
Jeyarajah et al.44 Clinical trial – prospective (cost-utility), (n = 193) UK Cancer (colorectal) I (cancer follow-up by nurse-led clinic) C: recurrence of disease, survival, death
E: costs/QALY
Adjusted cost was £1914/QALY gained for lower risk tumours and £2180/QALY gained for higher-risk tumours. Colorectal nurse specialist Physical exam, PR exam, order tests (e.g. sigmoidoscopy), referrals, counselling
Koinberg et al.47 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-minimization), (n = 264) Sweden Cancer (breast) I (follow up by nurse), UC (follow up by physician) E: resource use, costs Nurse intervention was 20% less expensive compared to the physician follow up (£495 vs £630). Specialist nurse Patient education and counselling, order exams (e.g. mammography)
Ndosi et al.57 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-utility), (n = 181) UK RA I (nurse-led care), UC (rheumatologist-led care) C: disease activity
E: costs/QALY
I was more cost-effective than UC with respect to cost and disease activity score, but not in relation with QALY utility scores. Clinical Nurse specialist Consultation (history and physical exam), prescribing medications, intra-articular or intramuscular steroid, injections, counselling
Paez and Allen58 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-effectiveness), (n = 228) US CAD I (lipid management by nurse), UC (lipid management by primary provider and/or cardiologist) C: lipid levels
E: cost/reduction in lipids (mg/dL)
Annual incremental cost-effectiveness of I was US$26.03 per mg/dL and US$39.05 per percent reduction in LDL-C. Nurse practitioner Consultation, prescribing medications, counselling. Telephone follow up
Patel et al.30 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-utility), (n = 31) Sweden Heart failure I (home nurse follow-up), UC (conventional care) C: HRQL, symptom control
E: costs/QALY
Total cost related to HF was lower in the intervention group after 12 months (p = 0.05). Costs/QALY was lower in I (NS). Specialist nurse Home consultations, telephone follow up, order tests (bloods), prescribing medicines
Postmus et al.31 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-utility), (n = 1023) Multicentre Heart failure I Basic (basic support by nurse), I Intensive (intensive support by nurse), UC (cardiologist care) C: readmission, deaths, number of days lost because of death or HF readmission
E: costs/QALY
Basic support was found to dominate both care as usual and intensive support because it generated 0.023 and 0.004 excess QALYs while saving €77 and €1178, respectively. Nurse specialist in HF Hospital consultation, home visits, telephone availability, education and counselling
Stewart et al.33 Observational (cost-analysis), (n = 122,000) UK Heart failure Three models of HF nurse care: clinic-based service, home-based service, hybrid service E: estimated number of patients exposed to HF services, cost and resource use of services in three models of care Cost of applying a national programme of home-, clinic- or mix-based follow up was calculated to be £69·4, £73·1 and £72·5 million per annum, respectively. Specialist HF nurse Hospital consultations, home visits
Turner et al.35 Clinical trial – RCT (cost-utility), (n = 1163) UK Heart failure/CAD I (nurse management programme).
UC (general practice care)
C: QALY
E: costs/QALY
I generated additional QALY at an incremental cost of £13,158 per QALY compared to the UC. Specialist nurse Consultation, order tests, medication management, home visits

UC: usual care; I: intervention; C: clinical; E: economic; NS: statistically non-significant; CI: confidence interval; GP: general practitioner; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; CAD: coronary artery disease; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin; QOL: quality of life; HRQL: health-related quality of life; QALY: quality-adjusted life-year.