Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):413–423. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0048

Table 4.

Intervention Outcomes: Hepatitis C ψ

Performance Pre - Post Test Comparison
Module Baseline ϕ Follow-Up
(T1) ¥
Follow-Up
(T2) §
Baseline to T1 T1 to T2 Baseline to T2
Mean (SD) T Value (p)
Hepatitis C - Infection Prevention (IP)a
Raw Score 7.8 (1.4) 9.0 (1.2) 8.9 (1.3) 5.3 (0 < 0.0001)c 0.1 (0.9028) 4.3 (0.0007)
Percent Correct - - - - - -
Hepatitis C – Knowledge b
Raw Score 5.7 (2.1) 7.9 (1.5) 6.9 (1.4) 5.1 (0<0.0001) −1.9 (0.0704) 4.3 (0.0005)
Percent Correct 51.4 (18.7) 71.4 (13.3) 62.7 (12.5) - - -
ψ

Content of Hepatitis C survey, structurally distinct from MRSA survey.

ϕ

Pre intervention, N = 23.

¥

Conducted 1 month post-intervention, N = 22.

§

Conducted 8 weeks post-intervention, N = 19.

Paired t-test conducted on raw scores.

a

Total amount of items = 4. Responses presented on a 10 point scale.

b

Total amount of items = 11.

c

Outlier present among distribution of differences between groups (baseline and T1)