Table 1. Comparison of the proposed method with all the previous methods according to the AUCs of global and local LOOCV and their Growth Rate (GR) of SSCMDA compared with the other models.
| Model | Global LOOCV | Global GR of SSCMDA | Local LOOCV | Local GR of SSCMDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSCMDA | 0.9007 | —— | 0.8747 | —— |
| HGIMDA | 0.8781 | 2.57% | 0.8077 | 8.30% |
| RLSMDA | 0.8426 | 6.90% | 0.6953 | 25.80% |
| HDMP | 0.8366 | 7.66% | 0.7702 | 13.57% |
| WBSMDA | 0.8030 | 12.17% | 0.8031 | 8.92% |
| RWRMDA | —— | —— | 0.7891 | 10.85% |
| MCMDA | 0.8749 | 2.95% | 0.7718 | 13.33% |