Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 29;8:1827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19997-5

Table 1.

‘Me’-trials (confronted with a rule).

Estimate SD 95% CI
intercept (cathodal tDCS – negative) 0.42 0.053 [0.32, 0.523]
sham tDCS −0.01 0.073 [−0.15, 0.13]
anodal tDCS −0.16 0.077 [−0.31, −0.01]
neutral consequence 0.58 0.071 [0.44, 0.71]
positive consequence 0.58 0.071 [0.43, 0.71]
sham tDCS × neutral −0.10 0.097 [−0.29, 0.09]
anodal tDCS × neutral 0.05 0.103 [−0.15, 0.25]
sham tDCS × positive 0.01 0.097 [−0.19, 0.19]
anodal tDCS × positive 0.15 0.103 [−0.06, 0.35]
random intercept variance 0.08 0.034 [0.00, 0.13]

Random intercept regression predicting the propensity to follow rules in ‘me’-trials, depending on the tDCS condition.