Table 6.
Sexual partners (past 3 months) | Unsafe sex/monogamous partner | Unsafe sex/non-monogamous partner | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
b | SE | z | b | SE | z | b | SE | z | |
Gender | −0.36*** | 0.07 | 5.16 | −0.61*** | 0.21 | 2.96 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.07 |
Lagged value | 0.52** | 0.03 | 16.34 | 0.87*** | 0.11 | 7.83 | 0.81** | 0.28 | 2.92 |
Sexual values | 0.32*** | 0.04 | 8.10 | 0.69*** | 0.13 | 5.26 | 0.91*** | 0.18 | 4.99 |
Peer PAC | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.30 | −0.10 | 0.08 | 1.16 | −0.21 | 0.12 | 1.70 |
Parental PAC | −0.07* | 0.03 | 2.39 | −0.12 | 0.08 | 1.45 | −0.17 | 0.12 | 1.37 |
Peer PAC × parental PAC | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.06 | −0.07 | 0.09 | 0.73 |
Peer PAC × values | 0.05 | 0.03 | 1.66 | −0.13 | 0.11 | 1.19 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
Parental PAC × values | 0.09*** | 0.03 | 3.25 | −0.02 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.53 |
Peer PAC × parental PAC × values | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.41 | −0.11 | 0.07 | 1.47 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.28 |
Note: Gender was coded 0 = female and 1 = male. PAC = Perceived awareness and caring, higher values indicate greater PAC; Values = Sexual values, higher values indicate more liberal views. Statistics reported are from the final statistical models
p <.05;
p <.01;
p <.001