Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Mar 17;39(3):682–694. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9476-8

Table 6.

Longitudinal associations between parental PAC, peer PAC, and sexual values with three indices of sexual behavior

Sexual partners (past 3 months) Unsafe sex/monogamous partner Unsafe sex/non-monogamous partner



b SE z b SE z b SE z
Gender −0.36*** 0.07 5.16 −0.61*** 0.21 2.96 0.02 0.29 0.07
Lagged value 0.52** 0.03 16.34 0.87*** 0.11 7.83 0.81** 0.28 2.92
Sexual values 0.32*** 0.04 8.10 0.69*** 0.13 5.26 0.91*** 0.18 4.99
Peer PAC −0.01 0.03 0.30 −0.10 0.08 1.16 −0.21 0.12 1.70
Parental PAC −0.07* 0.03 2.39 −0.12 0.08 1.45 −0.17 0.12 1.37
Peer PAC × parental PAC −0.01 0.02 0.50 0.00 0.06 0.06 −0.07 0.09 0.73
Peer PAC × values 0.05 0.03 1.66 −0.13 0.11 1.19 0.03 0.16 0.18
Parental PAC × values 0.09*** 0.03 3.25 −0.02 0.10 0.24 0.08 0.15 0.53
Peer PAC × parental PAC × values 0.03 0.02 1.41 −0.11 0.07 1.47 0.03 0.12 0.28

Note: Gender was coded 0 = female and 1 = male. PAC = Perceived awareness and caring, higher values indicate greater PAC; Values = Sexual values, higher values indicate more liberal views. Statistics reported are from the final statistical models

*

p <.05;

**

p <.01;

***

p <.001