Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 2;155:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.042

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Decoding successful memory formation and retrieval. a. Probability of encoding success as a function of list position. The top panel depicts the probability of recalling an item as a function of serial position, for each tercile of classifier output. Below, the difference in percent recall change (relative to average percent recall) between the upper and lower tercile of classifier output. b. Probability of retrieval success increases across the memory search period. The top panel shows the average proportion of recalls made in epochs decoded across the recall period, sorted into terciles based upon classifier output. Below, the difference in the proportion of recalls made relative to the mean between upper and lower terciles of classifier output. c. Overall change in memory performance during encoding (ENC) and retrieval (RET) between high and low classifier terciles. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.