Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Apr;19(4):16. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0643-y

Table 1.

Three strategies to manage CVD risk in rheumatoid arthritis.

Strategy Targets Measures Evidence-based Examples Pros/Cons
RA control
graphic file with name nihms1500013t1.jpg
Disease activity E.g. Treat-to-Target: Reducing inflammation improves CVD risk and outcomes in multiple trials [1417] Pro: Leverages rheumatologist expertise
Con: Overlooks other modifiable risk factors
Individual risk
graphic file with name nihms1500013t2.jpg
Framingham or SCORE calculation with 1.5 multiplier E.g. 30 minute nurse visits for CVD risk assessment identified many new risk factor diagnoses (e.g. new diabetes in 14%) [49] Pro: Comprehensive
Con: Resource intensive
Population risk
graphic file with name nihms1500013t3.jpg
Hypertension (BP)
Smoking status
Cholesterol
Diabetes (A1C)
Obesity (BMI)
Inactivity
E.g. Staff protocols increased blood pressure control from 50% to 80% in a health maintenance organization [61] Pro: Broad reach, empowers non-MD staff
Con: Targets specific risk factors, not comprehensive