Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 8;115(4):696–701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706800115

Table 1.

Comparison between malleability and coping

Outcome Comparison Time point B z P d
Malleability mindset Malleability vs. coping Postmeasure −0.40 [−0.54, −0.24] −5.21 <0.001 −0.40
2 wk −0.44 [−0.58, −0.29] −5.98 <0.001 −0.45
2 mo −0.44 [−0.59, −0.29] −5.59 <0.001 −0.44
6 mo −0.44 [−0.66, −0.22] −3.93 <0.001 −0.45
Negative attitudes Malleability vs. coping Postmeasure 0.18 [0.08, 0.28] 3.49 <0.001 0.18
2 wk 0.19 [0.09, 0.29] 3.73 <0.001 0.20
2 mo 0.23 [0.12, 0.34] 4.09 <0.001 0.24
6 mo 0.33 [0.16, 0.30] 3.79 <0.001 0.34
Hope Malleability vs. coping Postmeasure −0.38 [−0.56, −0.21] −4.26 <0.001 −0.34
2 wk −0.32 [−0.50, −0.15] −3.57 <0.001 −0.28
2 mo −0.26 [−0.45, −0.07] −2.73 0.006 −0.23
6 mo −0.39 [−0.63, −0.15] −3.17 0.002 −0.34

Comparisons in level between the malleability and the coping conditions for each time point. These comparisons were made by centering the longitudinal model on different time points. For each time point, we present the coefficient, confidence intervals, z scores, P values, and Cohen’s d for each comparison.