Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 8;115(4):696–701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706800115

Table 2.

Comparison between malleability and perspective-taking

Outcome Comparison Time point B z P d
Malleability mindset Malleability vs. perspective-taking Postmeasure −0.14 [−0.29, 0.002] −1.94 0.05 −0.15
2 wk −0.26 [−0.41, −0.12] −3.59 <0.001 −0.26
2 mo −0.21 [−0.36, −0.06] −2.72 0.01 −0.22
6 mo −0.25 [−0.47, −0.03] −2.24 0.03 −0.25
Negative attitudes Malleability vs. perspective-taking Postmeasure 0.03 [−0.07, 0.13] 0.67 0.50 0.04
2 wk 0.04 [−0.06, 0.13] 0.70 0.48 0.04
2 mo 0.06 [0.05, 0.16] 1.01 0.31 0.07
6 mo 0.10 [−0.07, 0.27] 1.20 0.23 0.11
Hope Malleability vs. perspective-taking Postmeasure −0.22 [−0.39, −0.04] −2.40 0.02 −0.19
2 wk −0.13 [−0.31, 0.05] −1.43 0.15 −0.11
2 mo −0.27 [−0.46, −0.08] −2.77 0.01 −0.24
6 mo −0.17 [−0.41 0.06] −1.43 0.15 −0.15

Comparison between the malleability and the perspective-taking conditions. These comparisons were made by centering the longitudinal model on different time points. We present the adjusted, unstandardized coefficient for each time point, confidence intervals, z scores, P values, and Cohen's d for each comparison.