Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;67(5):483–492. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17048

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients between grain yield and the phenological, morphological, physiological, and yield component traits of the MSD lines at Wad Medani with optimum sowing (MED/OS), Wad Medani with late sowing (MED/LS), Dongola (DON), and Hudeiba (HUD)

Trait MED/OS MED/LS DON HUD
DH −0.52*** −0.33*** −0.17*** −0.29***
DM −0.50** −0.10ns −0.15*** −0.22***
GFD 0.27*** −0.01ns 0.17** 0.13*
PH 0.26*** 0.04ns −0.17** −0.09ns
PL 0.32*** 0.13* −0.13* −0.03ns
CT −0.11* −0.07ns 0.006ns −0.10ns
SPAD 0.14* 0.11ns −0.05ns 0.03ns
NDVI 0.39*** −0.18** 0.02ns 0.03ns
KS 0.41*** 0.21* 0.21*** 0.28***
TKW 0.41*** 0.26*** 0.09ns 0.39***
Gm−2 0.31*** 0.39*** 0.33*** 0.54***
BIO 0.42*** 0.38*** 0.47*** 0.59***
HI 0.81*** 0.74*** 0.60*** 0.52***
HTE −0.25*** −0.54***
*, **, ***

significant at the 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 probability levels, respectively;

ns

, non-significant;

DH, days to heading; DM, days to maturity; GFD, grain filling duration; PH, plant height; PL, peduncle length, CT, canopy temperature; SPAD, chlorophyll content; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; KS, kernel number per spike; TKW, thousand-kernel weight; Gm−2, grain number per m2; BIO, biomass; HI, harvest index; HTE, heat tolerance efficiency.