Table 3.
Average coverage for different partitioning strategies when the clock is seriously violated
Model |
![]() |
Calibration | C (1P) | CP (2P) | G (50P) | GCP (100P) | PF (V) | CS (V) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR | G(2, 40) |
![]() |
72 | 7 | 46 | 11 | 5 | 56 |
![]() |
![]() |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
G(2, 0.4) |
![]() |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
G(2, 40) |
![]() |
100 | 96 | 92 | 93 | 95 | 99 | |
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
100 | 94 | 85 | 86 | 91 | 98 | |
![]() |
||||||||
G(2, 0.4) |
![]() |
99 | 93 | 83 | 84 | 90 | 97 | |
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
82 | 52 | 68 | 63 | 53 | 73 | |
t
![]() |
||||||||
AR |
![]() |
![]() |
100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
![]() |
![]() |
95 | 92 | 38 | 43 | 92 | 98 | |
![]() |
Notes:Coverage is averaged over the 100 replicates and over the 8 internal nodes on the tree. See caption of Table 1 for more details.