Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;67(1):61–77. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx061

Table 3.

Average coverage for different partitioning strategies when the clock is seriously violated

Model Inline graphic Calibration C (1P) CP (2P) G (50P) GCP (100P) PF (V) CS (V)
IR G(2, 40) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 72 7 46 11 5 56
  Inline graphic(2, 4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 100 100 100 100 100 100
  G(2, 0.4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 100 100 100 100 100 100
  G(2, 40) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 100 96 92 93 95 99
    Inline graphic B(0.525, 0.575)            
  Inline graphic(2, 4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 100 94 85 86 91 98
    Inline graphic B(0.525, 0.575)            
  G(2, 0.4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 99 93 83 84 90 97
    Inline graphic B(0.525, 0.575)            
  Inline graphic(2, 4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 82 52 68 63 53 73
    t Inline graphic B(0.575, 0.625)            
AR Inline graphic(2, 4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 100 100 0 0 100 100
  Inline graphic(2, 4) Inline graphic B(0.8, 1.2) 95 92 38 43 92 98
    Inline graphic B(0.525, 0.575)            

Notes:Coverage is averaged over the 100 replicates and over the 8 internal nodes on the tree. See caption of Table 1 for more details.