Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;66(4):590–603. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw104

Table 1.

Genomic data sets used in this study (sorted by increasing data set size)

Clade Data Time depth (Ma) No. of taxa No. of bases (millions) No. of sequencesInline graphic Data source
Land plants Mitochondrial genomes 450Inline graphic 93 31.3 93 GenBank
Angiosperms Plastid genomes 139Inline graphic 663 98.3 663 GenBank
Caryophyllales Transcriptomes 107Inline graphic 67 1388.2 1.61 million Dryad
Oryza Whole genomes 15Inline graphic 11 3731.9 20,071 Gramene rel. 27
Anopheles Whole genomes 100Inline graphic 17 3871.0 148,163 GenBank
Fabaceae (Papilionoideae) Whole genomes 60Inline graphic 8 5168.4 130,672 GenBank
Eudicots Whole genomes 136Inline graphic 24 9402.8 298,907 Phytozome 10.3

Inline graphic That is, genomes, chromosomes, scaffolds, contigs, treated as disjoint assembly units; Inline graphicages from Sanderson and Doyle (2001), Inline graphicMagallón et al. (2015), Inline graphicTang et al. (2010), Inline graphicNeafsey et al. (2015), and Inline graphicLavin et al. (2005).