Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 9;9(3):3029–3042. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23073

Table 4. Effect of dietarys on quality traits of Longissimus muscle.

Item Dietary treatment SEM p-value
LN LC AN AC Treatment alfalfa CSFA alfalfa × CSFA
Shear force, kg 4.35 3.88 4.18 4.28 0.133 0.619 0.667 0.481 0.297
Cooking loss, % 33.7ab 32.5a 35.7b 31.2a 0.509 0.010 0.679 0.004 0.089
Water holding capacity, % 55.5 53.5 54.0 54.4 0.606 0.711 0.805 0.535 0.338
Drip loss, % 6.53 6.75 6.43 6.91 0.112 0.439 0.900 0.126 0.569
Dry matter, % 26.5 26.6 26.3 26.9 0.182 0.658 0.833 0.325 0.447
Crude protein, % DM 83.2 83.0 82.8 83.1 0.165 0.835 0.650 0.908 0.427
Intramuscular fat, % DM 14.6 14.9 15.0 14.8 0.171 0.858 0.683 0.920 0.447

LN = Leymus as the only roughage with No calcium salts of fatty acid, LC = Leymus as the only roughage with Calcium salts of fatty acids, AN = Alfalfa replace 50% leymus with No calcium salts of fatty acids, AC = Alfalfa replace 50% leymus with Calcium salts of fatty acids.

p-value: Treatment: P value of Duncan’s multiple comparisons between diets treatments and different lowercase letters within the same row denote significant differences between the treatments; alfalfa, CASF and alfalfa × CSFA: the factorial analysis of crude protein levels, CSFA and their interaction.