Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 12;9(3):3069–3080. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23149

Table 1. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic analysis of mice one week after sham or LAD ligation.

Sham MI
Vehicle (n = 5) RFP (n = 5) Vehicle (n = 5) RFP (n = 5)
LVAWd (mm) 0.72 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.04 1.19 ± 0.05** 0.79 ± 0.05#
LVIDd (mm) 3.04 ± 0.1 3.11 ± 0.2 3.94 ± 0.3** 3.18 ± 0.3*#
EF (%) 75.5 ± 3.4 76.1 ± 5.5 58.2 ± 2.5** 66.5 ± 3.7*##
HR (bpm) 551.2 ± 44.4 567.5 ± 53.1 571.2 ± 47.2 561.2 ± 41.8
LVESP (mmHg) 98.2 ± 6.4 97.1 ± 5.5 82.6 ± 3.2** 92.6 ± 6.9##
LVEDP (mmHg) 1.7 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.4** 3.5 ± 0.3*#
Max dp/dt (mmHg/S) 10116 ± 564.5 9946 ± 411.5 6018 ± 376.1* 8287 ± 506.3*#
Min dp/dt (mmHg/S) −8876 ± 334.6 −8344 ± 504.1 −5044 ± 207.6* −6944 ± 343.8*#

Note: LVAWd, left ventricular anterior wall end-diastolic thickness; EF, ejection fraction; LVIDd, left ventricular internal end-diastolic dimensions; HR, heart rate; LVESP, LV end-systolic pressur; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure; max dp/dt, maximal contraction velocity; min dp/dt, maximal relaxation velocity; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. respective sham mice. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. MI-vehicle mice.