Table 2. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses for overall survival and recurrence free survival in localized ccRCC patients.
Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR(95% CI) | p* | HR(95% CI) | p* | |
Overall survival | ||||
pT stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
pT2 vs pT1 | 3.70 (1.78-7.68) | <0.001 | 4.12(1.56-10.89) | 0.004 |
pT3 vs pT1 | 3.94(2.33-6.67) | <0.001 | 4.44(2.45-8.04) | <0.001 |
pT4 vs pT1 | 10.01(3.01-33.29) | <0.001 | 10.81(2.98-39.29) | <0.001 |
Fuhrman grade | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
2 vs 1 | 1.53(0.55-4.27) | 0.419 | 1.15(0.40-3.26) | 0.798 |
3 vs 1 | 5.35(1.83-15.60) | 0.002 | 3.72(1.24-11.17) | 0.019 |
4 vs 1 | 7.39(1.65-33.08) | 0.009 | 9.10(1.91-43.31) | 0.006 |
Necrosis (present vs absent) | 3.30(1.97-5.51) | <0.001 | 2.52(1.44-4.44) | 0.001 |
Tumor size (continuous, cm) | 1.19(1.09-1.29) | <0.001 | 0.99(0.88-1.12) | 0.858 |
ECOG PS (≥1 vs 0) | 1.303(0.79-2.151) | 0.300 | - | - |
ST6GalNAc-1 (high vs low) | 2.51(1.56-4.04) | <0.001 | 2.74(1.66-4.52) | <0.001 |
Recurrence-free survival | ||||
pT stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
pT2 vs pT1 | 4.23(2.09-8.56) | <0.001 | 4.91(1.88-12.82) | 0.001 |
pT3 vs pT1 | 3.22(1.88-5.52) | <0.001 | 4.37(2.67-8.06) | <0.001 |
pT4 vs pT1 | 17.87(6.10-52.33) | <0.001 | 20.22(6.29-65.02) | <0.001 |
Fuhrman grade | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
2 vs 1 | 1.20(0.47-3.03) | 0.704 | 0.84(0.32-2.18) | 0.721 |
3 vs 1 | 3.60(1.34-9.66) | 0.011 | 2.85(1.02-8.00) | 0.047 |
4 vs 1 | 5.89(1.41-24.79) | 0.015 | 6.78(1.52-30.23) | 0.012 |
Necrosis (present vs absent) | 3.15(1.87-5.31) | <0.001 | 2.47(1.39-4.38) | 0.002 |
Tumor size (continuous, cm) | 1.19(1.09-1.29) | <0.001 | 0.99(0.88-1.12) | 0.859 |
ECOG PS (≥1 vs 0) | 1.19(0.71-1.99) | 0.511 | - | - |
ST6GalNAc-1 (high vs low) | 2.61(1.62-4.22) | <0.001 | 2.88(1.73-4.79) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
*Data obtained from the Cox proportional hazards model; p <0.05 was regard as statistically significant.