Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;9(3):3379–3393. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23273

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of transplantation outcome in TBF-MAC vs BF-MAC with selected busulfan dose.

Outcome HR 95% CI P
Relapse TBF vs BF 0.45 0.25–0.83 0.01
Patient age per 10 years 1.13 1.02–1.25 0.02
Secondary AML 1.25 0.88–1.77 0.2
URD vs MSD 1.11 0.81–1.52 0.49
Female donor to male recipient 0.96 0.72–1.29 0.8
In-vivo TCD 0.82 0.62–1.09 0.19
PBSC vs BM 0.96 0.72–1.29 0.81
centre (frailty) 0.69
NRM TBF vs BF 1.53 0.89–2.6 0.12
Patient age per 10 years 1.57 1.35–1.82 <10–5
Secondary AML 0.88 0.56–1.38 0.58
URD vs MSD 1.61 1.08–2.38 0.02
Female donor to male recipient 1.12 0.79–1.58 0.53
In-vivo TCD 0.814 0.562–1.177 0.27
PBSC vs BM 1.94 1.21–3.12 0.006
centre (frailty) 0.004
LFS TBF vs BF 0.82 0.56–1.2 0.31
Patient age per 10 years 1.26 1.16–1.38 <10–5
Secondary AML 1.08 0.82–1.42 0.59
URD vs MSD 1.27 0.99–1.61 0.059
Female donor to male recipient 1.03 0.82–1.29 0.79
In-vivo TCD 0.8 0.63–1.01 0.05
PBSC vs BM 1.27 0.98–1.64 0.07
centre (frailty) 0.22
OS TBF vs BF 0.95 0.63–1.44 0.82
Patient age per 10 years 1.32 1.19–1.45 <10–5
Secondary AML 0.99 0.73–1.33 0.92
URD vs MSD 1.21 0.92–1.58 0.17
Female donor to male recipient 1.02 0.81–1.3 0.85
In-vivo TCD 0.82 0.64–1.06 0.13
PBSC vs BM 1.37 1.03–1.82 0.03
centre (frailty) 0.14
GRFS TBF vs BF 0.78 0.54–1.126 0.18
Patient age per 10 years 1.21 1.118–1.319 <10–5
Secondary AML 1.04 0.807–1.344 0.76
URD vs MSD 1.21 0.963–1.52 0.10
Female donor to male recipient 1.25 1.027–1.517 0.76
In-vivo TCD 0.75 0.595–0.933 0.01
PBSC vs BM 1.29 1.007–1.663 0.04
centre (frailty) 0.02