Table 4. Multivariate analysis of transplantation outcome in TBF-MAC vs BF-MAC with selected busulfan dose.
Outcome | HR | 95% CI | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Relapse | TBF vs BF | 0.45 | 0.25–0.83 | 0.01 |
Patient age per 10 years | 1.13 | 1.02–1.25 | 0.02 | |
Secondary AML | 1.25 | 0.88–1.77 | 0.2 | |
URD vs MSD | 1.11 | 0.81–1.52 | 0.49 | |
Female donor to male recipient | 0.96 | 0.72–1.29 | 0.8 | |
In-vivo TCD | 0.82 | 0.62–1.09 | 0.19 | |
PBSC vs BM | 0.96 | 0.72–1.29 | 0.81 | |
centre (frailty) | 0.69 | |||
NRM | TBF vs BF | 1.53 | 0.89–2.6 | 0.12 |
Patient age per 10 years | 1.57 | 1.35–1.82 | <10–5 | |
Secondary AML | 0.88 | 0.56–1.38 | 0.58 | |
URD vs MSD | 1.61 | 1.08–2.38 | 0.02 | |
Female donor to male recipient | 1.12 | 0.79–1.58 | 0.53 | |
In-vivo TCD | 0.814 | 0.562–1.177 | 0.27 | |
PBSC vs BM | 1.94 | 1.21–3.12 | 0.006 | |
centre (frailty) | 0.004 | |||
LFS | TBF vs BF | 0.82 | 0.56–1.2 | 0.31 |
Patient age per 10 years | 1.26 | 1.16–1.38 | <10–5 | |
Secondary AML | 1.08 | 0.82–1.42 | 0.59 | |
URD vs MSD | 1.27 | 0.99–1.61 | 0.059 | |
Female donor to male recipient | 1.03 | 0.82–1.29 | 0.79 | |
In-vivo TCD | 0.8 | 0.63–1.01 | 0.05 | |
PBSC vs BM | 1.27 | 0.98–1.64 | 0.07 | |
centre (frailty) | 0.22 | |||
OS | TBF vs BF | 0.95 | 0.63–1.44 | 0.82 |
Patient age per 10 years | 1.32 | 1.19–1.45 | <10–5 | |
Secondary AML | 0.99 | 0.73–1.33 | 0.92 | |
URD vs MSD | 1.21 | 0.92–1.58 | 0.17 | |
Female donor to male recipient | 1.02 | 0.81–1.3 | 0.85 | |
In-vivo TCD | 0.82 | 0.64–1.06 | 0.13 | |
PBSC vs BM | 1.37 | 1.03–1.82 | 0.03 | |
centre (frailty) | 0.14 | |||
GRFS | TBF vs BF | 0.78 | 0.54–1.126 | 0.18 |
Patient age per 10 years | 1.21 | 1.118–1.319 | <10–5 | |
Secondary AML | 1.04 | 0.807–1.344 | 0.76 | |
URD vs MSD | 1.21 | 0.963–1.52 | 0.10 | |
Female donor to male recipient | 1.25 | 1.027–1.517 | 0.76 | |
In-vivo TCD | 0.75 | 0.595–0.933 | 0.01 | |
PBSC vs BM | 1.29 | 1.007–1.663 | 0.04 | |
centre (frailty) | 0.02 |