Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov 30;47(2):334–348. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0790-5

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics

Variablea n (%) or M (SD) range (kurtosis)
Sex (n = 3,395)
 Female 1,812 (53.4)
 Male 1,583 (46.6)
Age (n = 3,379) 14.58 (0.40) 12–16
Race and ethnicity (n = 3,311)
 Non-Hispanic White 520 (15.7)
 Hispanic 1,557 (47.0)
 Black 166 (5.0)
 Asian 535 (16.2)
 Multiethnic or other 533 (16.1)
Living situation (n = 3,360)
 Other type of living situation 1,226 (36.5)
 Living with both parents 2,134 (63.5)
Family history of substance use (n = 3,223)
 None 975 (30.3)
 Having family substance use history 2,248 (69.7)
Parental education level (n=2931)b
 High school graduate or higher degree 2,548 (86.9)
 Lower than high school graduate 383 (13.1)
Alternative reinforcement W1 (n = 3,279) 58.20 (24.07) 0–172 (0.32)
Alternative reinforcement W3 (n = 2,984) 52.12 (25.03) 0–176 (0.81)
Complementary reinforcement W1 (n = 3,288) 0.85 (3.56) 0–120 (24.40)
Complementary reinforcement W3 (n = 3,006) 1.65 (6.02) 0–176 (33.39)
Substance use in past 30 days W1 (n = 3,375) 0.27 (0.71)
Substance use in past 30 days W2 (n = 3,258) 0.41 (0.92)
Substance use in past 30 days W4 (n = 3,207) 0.46 (0.97)
a

Available (nonmissing) data; for categorical variables, denominator for within-column percentages.

b

Participants who marked “don’t know” response (N = 422) recoded as missing.