Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov 30;47(2):334–348. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0790-5

Table 3.

Indirect effect analyses

Predictor Mediator(s) Outcome Indirect effect (β) 95% CI Effect size

  • Low parental education W1

  • Alternative reinforcement W1

  • Substance use W2

 .013 0.006, 0.019 12.3%

  • Low parental education W1

  • Complementary reinforcement W1

  • Substance use W2

 .029 0.008, 0.051 23.8%

  • Low parental education W1

  • Alternative reinforcement W1

  • Substance use W2

  • Alternative reinforcement W3

  • Substance use W4

 .002 0.001, 0.010 9.5%

  • Low parental education W1

  • Complementary reinforcement W1

  • Substance use W2

  • Complementary reinforcement W3

  • Substance use W4

 .003 0.001, 0.011 13.6%

Note. N = 3,395. Substance use = number of substance use in prior 30 days. CI = confidence Interval. Effect size = proportion of total effect mediated by mediator(s).