Table 4.
Smoking
|
Alcohol Use
|
|
---|---|---|
Est. (SE)
|
Est. (SE)
|
|
NH Disadvantage -> Family Income | ||
Indirect Effect | .08 (.03) ** | .03 (.02) |
Total Effect | .49 (.14) *** | .14 (.10) |
NH Disadvantage -> Low Family Functioning | ||
Indirect Effect | .01 (.01) | .01 (.01) |
Total Effect | .43 (.14) ** | .13 (.10) |
NH Disadvantage -> Family Substance Use Environment a | ||
Indirect Effect | .01 (.01) | .00 (.01) |
Total Effect | .42 (.13) ** | .12 (.10) |
NH Disadvantage -> Deviant Peers | ||
Indirect Effect | .08 (.03) * | .06 (.03) * |
Total Effect | .48 (.14) *** | .18 (.10) |
Notes. N=808; Est. = estimate; SE = standard error; NH = neighborhood; each mediation model was run separately; all models controlled for associations between sociodemographic, family, and peer factors and each mediator;
= family smoking environment and family alcohol environment corresponded to each outcome.
p<.05,
p<.01,
p<.001.