Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Build Environ. 2017 Oct 6;126:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.007

Table 3.

HEPA vs. sham filtration comparison

Outcome % change* Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Sample size
Full analysis hsCRP 5.8% −36.6% 76.5% 23
IL-6 1.2% −20.5% 29.0%
TNFRII 3.3% −3.0% 9.9%
Remove homes with least PNC reduction hsCRP 15.6% −43.6% 137.0% 18**
IL-6 3.6% −19.9 34.1%
TNFRII 5.8% −2.3% 14.6%
Remove homes with largest number of indoor spikes hsCRP −8.9% −37.9% 33.7% 18**
IL-6 0.3% −25.8% 35.5%
TNFRII 2.0% −3.8% 8.3%
*

Adjusted for baseline; percent change is positive for higher blood biomarkers during HEPA.

**

The subgroup analyses are not the same set of participants, but instead the 18 participants with the largest PNC reduction and the fewest spikes respectively (see Table 2).