Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0189766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189766

Table 3. Incremental predictive value of textural parameters for EGFR TKI failure.

Base model Base model adjusted with textural parametersa) Base model adjusted with textural parameters and metabolic volume b)
Harrell's C-index
(95%CI)
P (vs. Base model) P (vs. Base model)
Co-occurrence homogeneity - 0.650
(0.578–0.723)
0.02 0.664
(0.582–0.745)
0.03
Voxel-alignment
intensity variability
- 0.644
(0.573–0.715)
0.03 0.663
(0.582–0.743)
0.03
Neighborhood-intensity difference busyness - 0.631
(0.562–0.701)
0.05 0.660
(0.580–0.739)
0.03
Intensity size zone
intensity variability
- 0.630
(0.558–0.702)
0.06 0.661
(0.579–0.744)
0.03
Co-occurrence entropy - 0.631
(0.559–0.704)
0.05 0.662
(0.580–0.745)
0.02
Voxel-alignment
short run emphasis
- 0.669
(0.597–0.741)
0.01 0.671
(0.592–0.751)
0.02
Neighborhood-intensity difference contrast - 0.632
(0.560–0.704)
0.11 0.671
(0.592–0.749)
0.04
Intensity size zone
high intensity zone emphasis
- 0.640
(0.565–0.715)
0.08 0.679
(0.599–0.759)
0.01
SUV(max) - 0.633
(0.562–0.705)
0.14 0.672
(0.593–0.751)
0.02
SUV(average) - 0.607
(0.528–0.687)
0.61 0.664
(0.579–0.749)
0.07
Initial disease status
and ECOG PS
0.596
(0.527–0.665)
- - - -

a) Harrell’s C-index calculated by Cox-proportional regression models adjusted for initial disease status, and ECOG PS

b) Harrell’s C-index calculated by Cox-proportional regression models adjusted for initial disease status, ECOG PS, and SUV metabolic volume

Abbreviations: SUV = standardized uptake value, ECOG PS = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status