Table 3. Pairwise differences in lytic like activity of honeybee workers after feeding on different stressors.
| U | p-value | |
|---|---|---|
| C vs. THIA | 62.000 | 0.004 |
| C vs. MMH | 60.000 | 0.004 |
| C vs. FLY | 69.000 | 0.011 |
| C vs. MMH+FLY | 79.000 | 0.029 |
| C vs. MMH+THIA | 100.000 | 0.165 |
| C vs. FLY+THIA | 112.000 | 0.376 |
| C vs. MMH+FLY+THIA | 83.000 | 0.039 |
| MMH+FLY+THIA vs. THIA | 78.000 | 0.044 |
| MMH+FLY+THIA vs. MMH | 103.000 | 0.329 |
| MMH+FLY+THIA vs. FLY | 115.000 | 0.609 |
MMH, E. faecalis strain MMH594; FLY, E. faecalis strain FLY1; THIA, thiacloprid; MMH+FLY, a mixture of both bacterial strains; MMH+THIA, thiacloprid mixed with the bacterial strain MMH594; FLY+THIA, thiacloprid mixed with the bacterial strain FLY9; MMH+FLY+THIA, a mixture of all three components: C, control; post hoc Man-Whitney U-tests, n = 16 for each treatment.