Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dysphagia. 2017 Aug 30;33(1):100–108. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9838-7

Table 2.

Linear versus quadratic modeling of ordinal and visual analog scale ratings of residue as described by Stevens (1975).

Bolus Type Equation (p-value) r2 Figure
Linear Modeling Thin Liquid y= −22.64 + 17.48x
p<0.0001
0.85 graphic file with name nihms903089t1.jpg
Applesauce y= −32.51 + 22.97x
p<0.0001
0.93 graphic file with name nihms903089t2.jpg
Cracker y= −32.35 + 21.11x
p<0.0001
0.91 graphic file with name nihms903089t3.jpg
Quadratic Modeling Thin Liquid y= 14.32 −17.80x + 6.73x2
p<0.0001
0.98* graphic file with name nihms903089t4.jpg
Applesauce y= 8.32 −12.33x + 5.88x2
p<0.0001
0.99* graphic file with name nihms903089t5.jpg
Cracker y= 10.20 −13.94x + 6.03x2
p<0.0001
0.98* graphic file with name nihms903089t6.jpg
*

Significantly different than respective r2 values of the same bolus type’s linear model r2 value (p<0.0001).

The equations listed here were done on transformed data in accordance with the described psychometric testing. The descriptive text lists other quadratic equations that can be used without transforming data.