Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2018 Mar;29(2):e11–e12. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000784

Table.

Prospective relation of a unit increase in cotinine level with physical performance indicators in non-smokers in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Wave 1 (2002/3) Wave 2 (2004/5) Wave 3 (2006/7) Wave 4 (2008/9) Wave 5 (2010/1) Wave 6 (2012/3)
Gait speed (m/s)
Analytical sample 2478 2120 1850 1547 1368 1148
Beta coefficients −0.013 (−0.021; −0.006) −0.018 (−0.026; −0.009) −0.018 (−0.026; −0.009) −0.009 (−0.018; −0.001) −0.013 (−0.024; −0.003) −0.001 (−0.021; 0.001)
Grip strength (kg)
Analytical sample 3352 2377 2024
Beta coefficients −0.340 (−0.521; −0.158) −0.301 (−0.531; −0.071) −0.221 (−0.471; 0.028)
Chair rises (failure)
Analytical sample 3046 2014 1753
Odds ratios 1.0 (0.9; 1.2) 1.2 (1.1; 1.4) 1.2 (0.9; 1.4)
Balance (failure)
Analytical sample 3301 2320 1969
Odds ratios 1.1 (1.0; 1.2) 1.1 (1.0; 1.2) 1.0 (0.9; 1.1)

Effect estimates are adjusted for age, gender, social class, limiting longstanding illness, alcohol intake, and body mass index. Covariates were collected at baseline examination in the Health Survey for England. The relation of cotinine level with gait speed and grip strength was estimated using linear regression; the relation of cotinine level with the balance test and chair rises was summarised using logistic regression.