Table 1.
Transcriptomic studies dealing with biotic stress responses in Malus x domestica used for meta-analysis.
Article | Objective | Pathogen Species | Pathogen | Tissue | Sample Information | Group | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Up | Down | ||||||
Gusberti, M. et al.14 | Resistance to Venturia | Venturia inaequalis | Fungi | Leaf | 212 | 112 | 100 | Fungal Pathogen |
Yin, Z. Y. et al.1 | Resistance to Valsa mali | Valsa mali | Fungi | Twig | 29 | 14 | 15 | |
Xu, J. H. et al.15 | Response to Marssonina coronaria inoculation | Marssoninacoronaria | Fungi | Leaf | 90 | 58 | 32 | |
Zhu, L. M. et al.2 | Response to Alternaria alternata | Alternaria alternate | Fungi | Leaf | 3854 | 2108 | 1746 | |
Shin, S. B. et al.3 | Response to Pythium ultimum | Pythium ultimum | Fungi | Root | 82 | 63 | 19 | |
Chen, S. Y. et al.5 | Apple stem grooving virus | Apple stem grooving virus | Virus | Shoot | 320 | 184 | 136 | ASGV |
Kamber, T. et al.4 | Responses to Erwinia amylovora | Erwinia amylovora | Bacteria | Flower | 823 | 640 | 183 | E. amylovora |
Number of up-regulated and down-regulated genes were indicated for each studies.