Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 10;5(1):171511. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171511

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The impact of positive publication weighing on the trustworthiness of published science. (ac) Show funding allocation 95%, 80%, 65% of published results are positive, respectively, while (d) depicts the situation when publications are completely agnostic. Science trustworthiness of all these scenarios in shown in figure (e), suggesting best trustworthiness obtained when journals were completely agnostic to whether a result was positive or null.