Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;5(1):171581. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171581

Table 1.

Scaling of jaw morphology over ontogeny in Catoprion mento and Pygopristis denticulata. For scaling scenarios, I = isometric growth, P = positive allometry and N = negative allometry.

independent variables r2 isometric slope intercept slope confidence intervals p scaling scenario Δ slope elevation? (p =) shift?
Tooth Aspect RatioC 0.243 0 0.622 0.125 0.070–0.224 5.16 × 10−2 P 0.16 <0.001 0.5
Tooth Aspect RatioP 0.654 0 0.632 0.211 0.127–0.349 4.17 × 10−3 P
Ant. MAC 0.386 0 0.700 −0.053 (−0.090)–(−0.031) 1.54 × 10−2 N 0.79 0.007 0.5
Ant. MAP 0.612 0 0.566 0.039 0.023–0.067 6.37 × 10−3 P
Post. MAC 0.004 0 1.206 0.132 0.068–0.254 4.20 × 10−1 P 0.72 <0.001 <0.001
Post. MAP 0.206 0 1.020 0.111 0.054–0.231 1.10 × 10−1 P
Occlusional OffsetC 0.958 1 −0.737 1.057 0.916–1.220 1.60 × 10−8 I 0.68 0.01 0.15
Occlusional OffsetP 0.995 1 −0.770 1.026 0.961–1.095 1.66 × 10−9 I
Jaw LengthC 0.986 1 0.397 0.983 0.905–1.067 5.94 × 10−11 I 0.001 <0.001 0.06
Jaw LengthP 0.998 1 0.419 0.834 0.799–0.870 7.65 × 10−11 N
Muscle CSAC 0.993 2 −1.998 1.946 1.770–2.139 6.50 × 10−7 I 0.28 <0.001 0.53
Muscle CSAP 0.983 2 −1.608 2.127 1.781–2.541 5.16 × 10−5 I
Second Moment-0C 0.960 4 −10.735 4.964 4.311–5.751 1.33 × 10−8 P 0.13 0.65 0.20
Second Moment-0P 0.984 4 −9.779 4.365 3.901–4.885 7.44 × 10−8 I
Second Moment-90C 0.974 4 −12.090 4.331 3.868–4.849 1.44 × 10−9 I 0.30 <0.001 0.84
Second Moment-90P 0.942 4 −9.186 3.861 3.121–4.776 6.79 × 10−6 I