Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct-Dec;30(4):252–255. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700040006

TABLE 1. Sample characterization subdivided and comparison of anthropometric, body composition and physical fitness of the groups SAS, SUS and NO.

Variables SUS (n=36) SAS (n=36) NO (n=36) p
Age (years) 50.0 (17.00) 49.5 (18.25) 44.0 (14.5) .501
Body mass (kg) 72.45 (14.77) 78.45 (15.20) 71.75 (19.95) .119
Height (m) 1.59 ±0.07 1.59 ±0.06 1.60 ±0.07 .821
BMI (kg/m2) 26.93 (6.93) 30.64 (6.20) 28.25 (8.20) .128
WC (cm) 82.65 (15.30) 84.00 (13.63) 85.75 (16.6) .453
HC (cm) 103.0 (15.42) 111.65 (13.45) 105.25 (18.17) .053
F% 36.39 ±8.50 40.68 ±6.78 39.1 ±7.56 .060
SMM (kg) 23.95 (3.60) 24.45 (5.18) 24.45 (4.85) .840
GS (kg/f) 27.00 6.30 25.63 ±5.30 25.62 ±4.68 .225
FLEX (cm) 24.50 15.75 20.14 ±9.40 21.61 ±6.69 .148
6MWT (m) 499.68 91.00 499.7 ±65.92 521.4 ±72.41 .297

*=Statistically significant difference; p=≤0,05; BMI=body mass index; WC=waist circumference; HQ=hip circumference; F%=fat percentage; SMM=skeletal muscle mass; GS=grip strength; FLEX=wells chair sit and reach test; 6MWT=6-minutes walking test; FLEX=flexibility; time since surgery SUS=38,0 (30); time since surgery SAS=61,0 (114,5). Anova one-away e Kruskal-Wallis