Table 4.
Results for the colon cancer data analysis
| Method | Parameter | Est | SE |
–value |
LB | UB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1A IV (R) | Oxaliplatin | 0.368 | 0.142 | 0.010 | 0.089 | 0.647 |
Age
|
–0.140 | 0.102 | 0.171 | –0.340 | 0.060 | |
Age
|
–0.270 | 0.115 | 0.018 | –0.495 | –0.045 | |
Age
|
–0.650 | 0.108 | 0.000 | –0.863 | –0.438 | |
| Income | 0.151 | 0.072 | 0.035 | 0.011 | 0.292 | |
| Diabetes | –0.210 | 0.087 | 0.015 | –0.379 | –0.040 | |
| Case 1A IV (BJ) | Oxaliplatin | 0.392 | 0.147 | 0.008 | 0.105 | 0.679 |
Age
|
–0.122 | 0.106 | 0.250 | –0.329 | 0.086 | |
Age
|
–0.310 | 0.121 | 0.010 | –0.547 | –0.073 | |
Age
|
–0.656 | 0.117 | 0.000 | –0.886 | –0.426 | |
| Income | 0.152 | 0.076 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 0.300 | |
| Diabetes | –0.245 | 0.093 | 0.009 | –0.427 | –0.062 | |
| Case 2B IV | Oxaliplatin | 0.398 | 0.144 | 0.006 | 0.116 | 0.681 |
Age
|
–0.115 | 0.102 | 0.258 | –0.314 | 0.084 | |
Age
|
–0.312 | 0.121 | 0.010 | –0.549 | –0.075 | |
Age
|
–0.637 | 0.117 | 0.000 | –0.866 | –0.408 | |
| Income | 0.158 | 0.075 | 0.034 | 0.012 | 0.304 | |
| Diabetes | –0.244 | 0.093 | 0.009 | –0.425 | –0.062 | |
| Naïve | Oxaliplatin | 0.149 | 0.079 | 0.059 | –0.006 | 0.304 |
Age
|
–0.162 | 0.102 | 0.112 | –0.362 | 0.038 | |
Age
|
–0.294 | 0.114 | 0.010 | –0.517 | –0.071 | |
Age
|
–0.709 | 0.104 | 0.000 | –0.913 | –0.505 | |
| Income | 0.167 | 0.070 | 0.017 | 0.030 | 0.304 | |
| Diabetes | –0.220 | 0.085 | 0.010 | –0.387 | –0.053 |
Case 1A IV (R), Case 1A instrumental variable method with
estimated by the rank method;
Case 1A IV (BJ), Case 1A instrumental variable method with
estimated by the Buckley–James
method; Est, estimated coefficient; SE, standard error; LB, lower bound of the 95%
Wald confidence interval; UB, upper bound of the 95% Wald confidence interval.











