Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 4;104(4):829–843. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asx043

Table 1.

Empirical size and power Inline graphic of the tests based on projection correlation, ranks of distances and distance correlation for different Inline graphic in Example 1 with Inline graphic andInline graphic. All numbers reported in this table are multiplied byInline graphic

Scenario Inline graphic Test Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
(1a) Inline graphic Projection correlation 1·1 28·4 53·4 70·0 80·1 88·1
    Ranks of distances 0·9 2·7 8·1 20·1 36·2 52·3
    Distance correlation 1·3 2·9 3·4 4·1 4·2 4·4
  Inline graphic Projection correlation 4·9 52·9 75·1 87·7 93·0 96·0
    Ranks of distances 4·9 11·2 25·1 42·2 60·4 75·2
    Distance correlation 6·1 5·3 5·4 6·3 6·4 6·1
(1b) Inline graphic Projection correlation 1·2 20·8 41·7 61·5 76·3 84·8
    Ranks of distances 0·9 2·3 8·0 19·5 35·3 51·3
    Distance correlation 1·4 3·0 4·0 4·2 4·5 5·0
  Inline graphic Projection correlation 5·2 39·9 64·8 81·4 89·5 94·6
    Ranks of distances 5·2 8·3 21·1 38·8 60·4 76·1
    Distance correlation 4·5 4·8 5·9 5·3 5·9 6·6
(1c) Inline graphic Projection correlation 1·0 65·1 98·8 100 100 100
    Ranks of distances 0·9 20·3 58·9 87·1 96·6 99·5
    Distance correlation 0·9 67·0 98·3 100 100 100
  Inline graphic Projection correlation 4·5 82·0 99·6 100 100 100
    Ranks of distances 4·7 37·7 79·6 96·2 99·1 100
    Distance correlation 5·1 82·3 99·5 100 100 100