Table 5.
Obstacle | Pre-Treatment Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Metallic Aluminum and Zinc | Magnetic density separation | Versatile Simple |
Initial cost, not for fines |
Eddy current separation | Can detect through several layers Can provide an accurate separation |
Initial cost, not for fines Susceptible to magnetic permeability changes |
|
Wet grinding | Consumes lower power per ton of product. Enables the use of wet screening or classification for close product control. Eliminates the dust problem. Enables the use of simple handling and transport methods such as pumps, pipes and launders. |
Storage of wet slurries | |
Washing with alkali | Simple | Cost of alkali | |
Salts | Washing with water | Simple | Secondary pollution of water, unless the water in the slurry is used to make concrete from the material |
Carbonation | CO2 from stack gas can be utilized and thus reduce the emission. Can be a method for carbon sequestration. |
Not a very fast process, unless the CO2 concentration is very high, which in turn will require air tight enclosures | |
Thermal treatment | Simple technology | Energy Consumption Cost |
|
Heavy metals | Washing with water | Simple | Secondary pollution of water |
Treatment with sulfide rich effluent | Simple and can utilize another waste stream | Applicable for specific heavy metals | |
Wet grinding | Simple No addition of additional chemicals |
Storage of wet slurries | |
Phosphation | Stabilizes heavy metals | Applicable only for specific applications | |
Cement stabilization | Stabilizes heavy metals | Cost of cement | |
Hydrothermal treatment | Capital cost | ||
Electrodialytic remediation | Costly Energy Consumption |