Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 11;13(1):102–113. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx119

Table 4.

MVPA: pairwise classifications

Left Right
a. Whole STS
 Speech–angry 78.13 (65.63) 65.63 (62.50)
 Speech–happy 62.50 (62.50) 71.88 (62.50)
 Gaze–speech 68.75 (65.63) 81.25 (64.06)
 Gaze–angry 75.00 (65.63) 68.75 (62.50)
 Gaze–happy 65.63 (62.50) 68.75 (65.63)
 Angry–happy 56.25 (62.50) 53.13 (62.50)
 Emo–non-Emo 62.50 (62.50) 56.25 (62.50)
 Eyes–mouth 68.75 (62.50) 71.88 (62.50)
b. pSTS
 Speech–angry 62.50 (62.50) 43.75 (62.50)
 Speech–happy 46.87 (65.63) 62.50 (62.50)
 Gaze–speech 43.75 (65.63) 68.75 (65.63)
 Gaze–angry 75.00 (65.63) 71.88 (62.50)
 Gaze–happy 50.00 (65.63) 68.75 (65.63)
 Angry–happy 65.62 (62.50) 65.62 (62.50)
 Emo–non-Emo 53.13 (65.63) 59.37 (65.63)
 Eyes–mouth 50.00 (62.50) 46.87 (62.50)

Notes: Values represent the mean accuracy of pairwise classifications, together with significance cutoffs reported in brackets. Results are shown for the (a) whole anatomical STS mask and (b) the pSTS functional ROI defined by a separate face localizer. Classification performances were significantly better than chance are marked in bold.